I found many points in Pensky's article intriguing. I liked the way Pensky
labeled the two groups as "Digital Natives" and "Digital Immigrants". These
monikers helped me understand more readily where Pensky saw people. Using his
logic, everything he says makes sense. It makes sense that is why the students
do not seem to mix well with the teachers, because they speak two different
languages. Although, isn't that what every generation says about the previous
generation? At any rate, the idea of an "accent" was also interesting. I can
quite readily apply that to my teaching with my middle school students. I am up
on many of the "new" things but there are still some areas that I may come up
short. Therefore exposing myself to be not that hip to my students. I also drew
another connection between the Penske article and my students. Most of my
students want to listen to music while they are completing other on-line tasks
or assignments. My patented response is "No". Perhaps I am projecting my
inability to do so on to my students. Something for me to think about. Another
item I see in the article as well as my students would be the gaming scenario.
My school district has many web-based educational applications and many of them
look like games. They collect items and receive badges for their efforts. Fun.
Using these types of interfaces works very well with the students at my school.
We are a highly impoverished school and the school has had very low test scores
for decades. Since last year we have been using many of these on-line
applications and out scores are rising fast. I am not saying it is all due to
education games but I do think there is merit in not educating students the same
way we were educated simply because it was "good enough for us".
Reading the
first article, Close to the Edge, I found myself getting confused with lingo and
terminology. I actually had to force myself to slow down while I read so I could
better work through what was being presented. I could not find much to attribute
or discredit from this article. It was mainly based on a particular generation
and what they are all about. There was one point, toward the end of the article,
that I can readily attribute to my students. The article says that Generation
Edge is not likely to "get on board" and is not very trusting. I have seen these
two things play out in real time every day of school. The middle school students
do not trust anyone, sometimes not even their own peers. They do not give
respect easy. However, when the students in my middle school do decide you are
worth it, they will do anything for you. They will defend you to other kids if
need be. They are fiercely loyal, one thing the article failed to mention about
Generation Edge.
The second article, Generation Edge: An Early Look at
America's Youngest Generation, gave much of the same information/opinion that
the first article did. There were a few new tidbits that I found to be very
interesting. The fact that some research is beginning to show that Generation
Edge may actually be able to create an actual relationship through a screen is
amazing. The possibilities, right? Also, I agreed with the authors terminology
of "switch tasking" instead of "multitasking". Switch tasking seems to make more
sense. I have some students who do well as switch tasking but I have many others
who really need to focus on one thing in order to be successful.
I am
currently involved with TRIG, Technology Readiness Infrastructure Grant. Our
coach introduced us to these same videos a few months ago and the "Did you
know?" videos are epic! I watched it again the other night and I was still able
to get a sense of urgency from it. Very powerful. The video explaining social
networking was also very educational.
Sunday, January 19, 2014
Friday, January 10, 2014
Opps. Should have read ALL the directions before I pulled the trigger. My name is Matt Wettstein. I am married to my college sweetheart. We have three sons: 10 years old, 7 years old and a 5 month old. Our 5 month old has Down Syndrome so we are spending a lot of time educating ourselves on the various medical/cognitive differences that he may face. I graduated college with my undergraduate degree in 2008. I had another career before teaching, that career was in shipping/receiving. I enjoy working with my hands. I like to take things apart although I cannot always guarantee I will be able to put them back together. One of the reasons I am interested in this field is because I love technology and I see a great potential benefit to using technology in the classroom. Technology allows people to collaborate much more readily from one point to another. It also allows students to see, in real time, what goes on around the world. I am excited and a little apprehensive about my first year at WSU. Have a great night.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)